GM Tops Customer Loyalty List for 2004 Posted 1/19/05 12:19 p.m. CST
By The Detroit Free Press
General Motors Corp. had the most return customers of all U.S. automakers in the 2004 model year, according to an annual survey of customer loyalty. It was the fifth consecutive time GM has topped the loyalty list.
Southfield, Mich.-based R.L. Polk & Co. said 65.1 percent of households owning a new GM vehicle returned to the same model or make when purchasing or leasing their next vehicle.
"General Motors' success can be partially attributed to the wide range of vehicle offerings," Polk CEO Stephen R. Polk said in a statement. "The more vehicle choices an automaker provides a returning customer, the more likely the customer will remain within the manufacturer family."
While GM won in the manufacturer category, the vehicle nameplate with the most customer loyalty was Ford, with 57.4 percent of customers returning. The average loyalty for all brands was 44.8 percent. Ford has placed No. 1 in brand loyalty since Polk started bestowing its awards in 1996.
quote: Originally posted by: thewizard16 "Interesting... but some of those I just don't understand. For example, the Ion and the Ranger. Why???"
Probably because people who chose them in the first place already decided that their pros outweighed their cons. Many people like the Saturn dealer experience and apparently decided that it was a good enough car to buy again. The Ranger is even easier to explain, people who wanted a cheap pickup before want a cheap pickup again when it's time to buy a replacement.
quote: Originally posted by: ifcar "Probably because people who chose them in the first place already decided that their pros outweighed their cons. Many people like the Saturn dealer experience and apparently decided that it was a good enough car to buy again. The Ranger is even easier to explain, people who wanted a cheap pickup before want a cheap pickup again when it's time to buy a replacement."
Well, I can maybe see the dealership thing, though we went back to buy Toyota again and that certainly wasn't because of dealership experience . As for the Ranger, that's just dumb. I understand what you're saying, I just think it's a dumb idea.
quote: Originally posted by: thewizard16 " Well, I can maybe see the dealership thing, though we went back to buy Toyota again and that certainly wasn't because of dealership experience . As for the Ranger, that's just dumb. I understand what you're saying, I just think it's a dumb idea."
The Ranger isn't a terrible truck, but it's a truck that doesn't hide that it's a truck (a virtue for some people) that is very inexpensive. Even if you don't like it, it's easy to see why people do.
We used to have a Ranger... 93 I believe. I genuinely hated that truck. It was cheap, which is why I bought it, but the interior fell apart in a few years, and the reliability was in the toilet. So, I'm probably biased against it. That and I don't find the newer Rangers to be much better on the interior aspect, though I've heard reliability is better.
quote: Originally posted by: thewizard16 "We used to have a Ranger... 93 I believe. I genuinely hated that truck. It was cheap, which is why I bought it, but the interior fell apart in a few years, and the reliability was in the toilet. So, I'm probably biased against it. That and I don't find the newer Rangers to be much better on the interior aspect, though I've heard reliability is better."
They're still bare-bones compared to the competition, but durable and inexpensive.