I can't believe they would have the Vette beat a Carrera but not a Boxster.
__________________
____________________
DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND MY CONTROL, MY BRAIN IS CURRENTLY NOT FUNCTIONAL. MY EMPLOYER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. AT THIS TIME, I HAVE NO WAY OF PREDICTING HOW LONG THIS ISSUE WILL TAKE TO CORRECT.
quote: Originally posted by: ifcar " The Boxster is much cheaper. "
Touche.
__________________
____________________
DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND MY CONTROL, MY BRAIN IS CURRENTLY NOT FUNCTIONAL. MY EMPLOYER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. AT THIS TIME, I HAVE NO WAY OF PREDICTING HOW LONG THIS ISSUE WILL TAKE TO CORRECT.
I can't load C&D on these computers anymore (blocking software is getting ridiculously overbearing) so I can't read the article, but why did they dislike the Crossfire so much? Extremely close between the Boxster and Corvette though, interesting.
quote: Originally posted by: thewizard16 "I can't load C&D on these computers anymore (blocking software is getting ridiculously overbearing) so I can't read the article, but why did they dislike the Crossfire so much? Extremely close between the Boxster and Corvette though, interesting."
The said it had a "lamentably stiff ride", a cramped interior, and flat-out "feels old". It was more expensive than the SLK too.
It is incredibly cramped inside, even for a sports car. How hard could it have been for them to stretch the wheelbase a few inches for decent legroom? "
Probably not very. I saw one around town a few weeks ago, and I personally don't think it's very attractive. It's very noticable, but not very pretty.
quote: Originally posted by: thewizard16 " Probably not very. I saw one around town a few weeks ago, and I personally don't think it's very attractive. It's very noticable, but not very pretty."
I like the look myself, and even those who don't (like you) admit that's eye-catching.